An Andisheh Almanac

Category: Words

Suspend City Schools of Decatur Superintendent Gyimah Whitaker Now

“Superintendent shall promptly notify the Board of issues which could result in potential financial or reputational exposure to the district.” Section 2, Line 12 of Superintendent Gyimah Whitaker’s contract with City Schools of Decatur.

Last month CSD’s board opened an “independent investigation” into Superintendent Gyimah Whitaker after she was publicly revealed to have engaged her husband’s media company to produce CSD’s podcasts.

Her husband, Jason Whitaker, is a professional right-wing podcaster whose shtick includes intensely vulgar hate speech. For example, he says trans people are “phony, false and fake” and that all Muslims are “low-IQ.”

Over the past year or so Superintendent Whitaker brought most of CSD’s board and several staff members to her husband’s podcast studio to record. By connecting CSD leadership, staff and communications products to a professional bigot, Dr. Whitaker demonstrated profound disrespect for the values of our community, and imho violated Section 2, Line 12 of her contract.

Superintendent Whitaker should immediately be placed on administrative leave pending the completion of the investigation. There’s clear and recent precedent for doing so. When CSD’s board decided to investigate Superintendent David Dude in 2021 for violating terms of his contract, he was suspended with pay during the investigation.

The school board hasn’t explained why Dr. Whitaker is being treated differently than Dude. Then again, they don’t explain much. The tens of thousands of dollars CSD spends on communications each month apparently doesn’t include a line item labeled “candor.”

This is more than bad communication though. By not placing Whitaker on leave during the investigation, the board is pouring fuel onto a reputational fire of its own making. The board’s job is to oversee the administration of Decatur schools on behalf of the public. But for several months, three board members (Carmen Sulton, Hans Utz, and James Herndon) have been acting like their job is to represent the superintendent and protect her from the consequences of her own actions.

Dr. Whitaker has insisted that her husband’s political media activities are separate from CSD’s work. That claim was hollow from the start. After all, in a world where every third adult is a podcaster, she chose the one who, on his podcast in March, said Muslims rape goats.

To everyone who chose to give Dr. Whitaker the benefit of the doubt that her work was distinct from her husband’s, Jason Whitaker has raised repeatedly a metaphorical middle finger. Since the investigation was announced he has openly and repeatedly used his podcast and social media platforms to urge his colleagues and supporters to advocate to the board and criticize the school district on his wife’s behalf.

Jason Whitaker’s friends and fans have responded by lobbing crude online attacks at the board. The only two members they attack by name though are Lorraine Irier and Tracey Anderson — the two who oppose Dr. Whitaker’s unpopular pet $23–28 million ECLC/daycare project.

An organic statewide groundswell against the Decatur school board is, I suppose, theoretically possible. But this groundswell consists entirely of Jason Whitaker’s podcast friends, all of whom have an unusually nuanced grasp of Decatur school board politics. They just happen to instinctively know which two members of the board to attack by name, and which three to spare from their jihad. Did I say jihad? Sorry, Jason. I meant crusade. Forgive me.

I don’t actually know if Dr. Whitaker is privately coordinating with her husband to put public pressure on the board and influence its investigation. Also, I don’t actually care anymore because I’ve seen how she’s acted on the job and in public.

Dr. Whitaker and her board allies permitted out-of-town speakers to address Decatur’s June school board meeting in apparent violation of the board’s rules.

School board policy limits public comments at meetings to “residents of the School District, representatives of businesses or organizations located in the District, parents or guardians of students attending the schools of the District, or school system employees.” Board policy also forbids public comments on personnel matters.

Watch the meeting video. Whitaker and the board majority allowed several people who don’t live in Decatur to express support for Whitaker and her, um, personnel matter. At the same meeting, Whitaker and the board majority also (correctly) cut off a speech from a Decatur parent because she attempted to share a personnel-related complaint about an employee at Talley.

In other words, the Board and Superintendent correctly applied the rule to a Decatur resident, then incorrectly ignored the rule for non-Decatur residents voicing support for Superintendent Whitaker. Another coincidence perhaps.

Jason Whitaker wasn’t at the June meeting, but afterward he publicly thanked his friends and fans for showing up to support his wife. While she’s claiming she works independently of her husband, her husband is publicly thanking his friends for showing up at her office.

Dr. Whitaker’s contract obligates her to notify the board of issues that could create reputational exposure for the district. We’re past that now. Instead, she has become the exposure.

The board cannot credibly investigate her actions while she remains on the job. Superintendent Whitaker needs to be suspended until the investigation of her actions is complete.

Update: City Schools of Decatur’s board met today (June 16) and again chose not to place Superintendent Whitaker on leave. The next meeting is August 11.

2026-06-16
Area Wife Guy keeps undermining his wife

Decatur’s school superintendent Gyimah Whitaker insists her husband Jason Whitaker’s bigoted podcast is not relevant to her work even though she had him produce the school’s podcast at his commercial recording studio.

Jason Whitaker clearly disagrees.

This week Jason Whitaker thanked his colleagues and fans for showing up at Decatur’s June 2 school board meeting (aka his wife Gyimah Whitaker’s office) to lobby in her defense.

It’s Jason Whitaker’s right to use his social media to cheer on and thumbs-up his wife. But there’s a reason Wife Guy is pejorative.

By aiming his podcast machine at Decatur he has obliterated his wife’s repeated assertion that her work is independent of her husband’s.

It wasn’t a very solid claim to begin with. By recording the school system’s podcast in Jason Whitaker’s commercial podcast studio for more than a year, the superintendent took the work of Decatur schools to the workplace of a loud and proud bigot. Gyimah Whitaker is the person who made Decatur schools a business partner of a man who repeatedly calls Muslim people “low-IQ” goat rapists, and who denies the humanity of trans people.

But Superintendent Whitaker can’t keep saying “my work has nothing to do with my husband’s work” while her husband is mobilizing his work colleagues and podcast listener(s) to show up at Decatur school board meetings and flood the board’s inboxes. The real Wife Guy move here would be for him to shut up.

Actually, she CAN keep saying that her work has nothing to do with her husband’s. She can say whatever she wants. But no one has to pretend to believe her anymore.

Also, some advice for Jason Whitaker’s friends: Don’t waste your time emailing the school board or speaking at our meetings. There’s very little indication the current board majority cares what anyone says about anything.

2026-06-05
Decatur’s School Board will do anything except what city residents want

What do I know about the New Markets Tax Credit program that I didn’t learn in the past hour? Zero.

What did I learn in the past hour? I learned NMTC was created to help economically distressed communities attract private capital. I learned Decatur’s school board is considering applying for an NMTC award to help pay for a new preschool building.

The census tract* where the Decatur school board (actually it’s just Superintendent Whitaker, Carmen Sulton, Hans Utz, and James Herndon) wants to build is, indeed, an NMTC-eligible tract.

Here’s a screenshot of the eligibility map:

Remember though: eligibility is just the minimum requirement.

Technically I am eligible to be President of the United States and People Magazine’s Sexiest Man Alive. Neither is likely.

Again, what I know about this program wouldn’t fill a Go-Gurt tube, but I’m guessing this program’s administrators would prioritize supporting communities that need investment but can’t otherwise attract it.

Decatur does not actually need help from a federal tax credit program to build or renovate a school. Decatur has a strong tax base and the school board has authority to issue bonds.

Decatur already has the ability to pay for what it needs (renovations of existing buildings, more teachers, higher pay). It even has the capacity to pay for a new building we don’t need but board is monomaniacally obsessed with.

What Decatur lacks is a school superintendent or school board majority that city residents trust. School leaders know this, which is why they’re doing everything they can to avoid putting the funding question in front of voters.

The school board doesn’t need help attracting investment. It needs credibility with the public. There‘s no federal program currently offering that.

(*If you want to find it on the map yourself, go here and search for Census Tract 13089022501)
Fediverse Reactions
2026-06-01
Yes to education. No to a new building.

Update: City Schools of Decatur Board Members Tracey Anderson and Lorraine Irier published letters in Decaturish today documenting the shifting justifications, evasion, poor cost oversight, and disdain for public scrutiny that have characterized the school system’s relentless push to construct a new preschool building.

On Tuesday, May 12, City Schools of Decatur’s Board of Education will vote on requiring city residents to pay to build a new early childhood learning center — aka a daycare building on the green space across from the Ebster gym.

Q: How much is the school board proposing to spend on this new building?

A: We don’t know. The price tag keeps changing. It was $23 million for a while. At a recent board meeting there was a discussion of trying to save money by paring back some unnecessary design elements. Between that meeting and today (May 11), the price jumped to $28 million (see slide 20).

Q: How many children who live in nearby Decatur Housing Authority apartments might attend the preschool?

A: We don’t know. The city says the school is necessary to serve kids who live in DHA housing who might not otherwise have access to quality early education. At one point, the board estimated 67 children would attend the new ECLC. That number keeps dropping. A board member told me today that the best current estimate of potential students from nearby DHA homes is just 22.

Q: How will the much discussed (and much needed) proposed renovations at Decatur High School proceed?

A: We don’t know. The board’s presentation to take on $28 million in debt for a new preschool does not address renovations at the high school.

Q: If Decatur spends $28 million, plus annual operating expenses of roughly $1.5M, to close achievement gaps for just 22 potential preschool students preschool, how much will Decatur plan to spend on closing achievement gaps for K-12 students?

A: We don’t know. When Decatur teachers, residents and two school board members, ask that question at public meetings, and note that there isn’t enough staff in elementary, middle and high school to devote the necessary time to students who need extra help, they don’t get direct answers from the board.

Q: With the city’s elementary enrollment declining, wouldn’t it be more cost effective to renovate rooms in existing buildings (ex. Westchester, Glennwood and College Heights) to meet our small city’s early childhood education needs?

A: We don’t know. I’ve read board members quoted saying that would be more expensive, but I’ve never seen those estimates.

Q: If Decatur is considering moving some Pre-K classes from College Heights to Westchester, Clairemont or Glennwood (as board member Han Utz suggested was possible at an April board meeting), would it really cost more than $23-28 million to renovate 2-4 classrooms at College Heights to serve 22 additional 0-3 year olds who live less than a mile away?

A: We don’t know. Because it doesn’t appear the school board is even considering that.

Q: How much of the estimated $1.5 million in annual operating expenses at a new school for would be paid for by Decatur taxpayers, and how much will be paid through education philanthropy, as Superintendent Whitaker suggested is likely?

A: Superintendent Whitaker said at a recent public meeting that Decatur wants to pursue philanthropic support for early childhood education, but that education philanthropists will not give the city money until a new school building is completed and operational. Let’s set aside for a moment the fact that education philanthropists do, in fact, commit to conditional funding for viable long-term projects. If we just take the superintendent’s answer it’s: We don’t know.

Q: Do Decatur residents support spending tens of millions of dollars on a new school building for kids ages 0-3?

A: We don’t know. 3 of the 5 board members strongly oppose putting the new building and its funding to a referendum. They’re even considering a special funding mechanism (Certificates of Participation) that would add 20% ($6 million!) to the building’s overall price tag just because doing so would deny voters a chance to vote yes or no. (Again, see slide 20)

Q: Will school board member James Herndon, who previously recused himself from a vote involving the new building because he has a professional conflict of interest, recuse himself on May 12. Or will he cast the deciding “yes” vote on a spending package expressly (see page 20) crafted to circumvent the will of Decatur voters?

A: We don’t know. It seems he likes suspense.

***

Sometimes when I go out to eat, the server will tell me there’s a special and describe it. If the server doesn’t say the price, I’ll ask. The server never says “We don’t know.”

Is it too much to ask of Decatur’s school board that it exercises the same level of fiscal due diligence as a diner considering the fish entrée? I’m worried the answer is, yes, it is too much to ask.

If the board votes “yes” to funding a new building tomorrow, they’re unfortunately voting “no” to fiscal responsibility, transparency, honesty, fiscal due diligence, community input, peer input, and the democratic process of a voter referendum. I’ve lived here since 2006 and haven’t previously witnessed our elected officials acting this disdainfully of their own constituents. I’m not alone.

I support education for all of Decatur’s kids and am willing to pay for it. I oppose spending $23-28 million on an unnecessary new building. Buildings don’t teach kids. Teachers do.

Yes to education. No to a new building.

***

2026-05-11
Free parking isn’t cheap
It is practical for Decatur to help people who live near busy commercial districts by banning non-resident parking on certain residential streets. I just want the city to price exclusive parking rights fairly.

The city is proposing charging residents on busy streets $25/year for exclusive rights to park on a street near their home. Is that a fair price?

Let’s compare $25 for a year of parking to what Decatur charges for the private use of other public spaces.

Reserving a public tennis court in Decatur costs $5 per hour. All-day admission to a swimming pool costs $6. All-day rental of the picnic pavilion at Oakhurst Park costs $180.
- Picnics: $180
- Swimming: $6
- Tennis: $5
- Car: $.068
Is it fair or reasonable to charge a city resident 73x more to play tennis on a public tennis court than a resident is charged to leave a private vehicle on a public right of way? Two of the six pillars of Decatur’s Destination 2030 plan are “Climate Action” and “Safe Mobility”? Does charging less than 7 cents per day to park support either of those pillars?

Another method of determining a fair price would be to consider property taxes. My back-of-the-envelope match suggests 150 square feet (roughly the amount of space a Kia Telluride takes up when parked on the street) taxed at the city’s millage rate would be about $283/year. That’s 11x what the city is proposing charging for parking.

If you prefer an apples-to-apples, or parking-to-parking comparison, the cheapest parking deck in Decatur I can think of is the $6/day courthouse deck. A year of weekday parking there at $6/day is $1,560. If you think that’s a lot, I paid $1.35 the other day for 30 minutes of metered parking.

Am I suggesting a parking permit should cost $65,700, the annualized price of a picnic table in Oakhurst Park? No. That would be absurd. But less absurd than giving away a public resource for a tiny fraction of its value, and in opposition to our stated climate and mobility goals.

Charge a fair price for parking and use the money on projects that reduce Decatur’s car dependency. Fewer of us would need to park on the street to go to Taqueria Del Sol if there were protected bike/scooter paths leading in and out of downtown from our neighborhoods.

I’m not anti-car. I own 3 of them. I just don’t think it’s anyone’s duty to subsidize my car ownership, or vice versa.

Subsidize this instead.
2026-05-04
Decatur’s School Board Needs to Stop It

I support CSD’s commitment to providing quality early childhood education to everyone in Decatur, regardless of their family’s ability to pay preschool tuition. As Superintendent Whitaker noted at March 25’s school board community meeting in Oakhurst, the best way to close reading achievement gaps in adolescence is with early childhood education that prevents the gaps from developing.

Nevertheless, I do not believe a large capital investment in a new building would serve Decatur’s children better than other possible investments. I urge the board and CSD’s administration to utilize existing buildings instead to expand and enhance the city’s early childhood education options.

CSD’s administration and its board have not convinced me or many of my neighbors why a new $23 million building is the correct solution to meeting our shared goal of providing excellent early childhood care to Decatur’s kids.

Additionally, Decatur City Commissioner George Dusenbury presented compelling evidence at a recent public meeting that CSD’s existing ECLC plan is grossly overpriced.

Dusenbury said the contractor’s estimate for the new building is about $4 million too high. Even if one supports building a new ECLC facility, does anyone support paying $4 million too much for it? $4 million would pay for a lot of preschool tuition for a lot of kids.

The board needs to stop. Stop the building. Also, stop being so petulant about the opposition to the building. It’s dividing the city.

At last week’s board community meeting, an audience member opposing the new building’s location said that LaGrange has done a better job of historical preservation than Decatur. Utz replied sarcastically, asking if the speaker was recommending Decatur build its new preschool in LaGrange? The audience jeered him.

Perhaps mistaking the jeers for cheers, three days later Utz attended Talley Elementary School’s fundraiser wearing a shirt that reads “I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you.”

Anyone who knows me knows I am a connoisseur of ridiculous t-shirts, but I’ve never seen that one before. Then again, I’ve never typed “What would Melania wear to an elementary school carnival men’s fitted medium” into Temu’s search bar.

Board chair and new building supporter Dr. Carmen Sulton took a different approach. She wasn’t sarcastic at last week’s community meeting. Instead she used her eyes to shoot ice lasers at the room when opponents of the new building were speaking. Watch a meeting video to see for yourself. You may want to grab a sweater first.

I attended the meeting expecting to hear Utz and Sulton try to persuade the audience that their preferred idea (a new building) is better than all the other possible solutions (renovating existing neighborhood school buildings). They’re proponents of the building, so surely, given an audience of taxpayers and a microphone, they’re going to press their case, right?

Wrong.

They didn’t bother talking up their preferred plan. They didn’t compare a new building’s cost or efficacy to renovation options. They didn’t contradict Commissioner Dusenbury’s evidence of $4 million in inflated cost projections. They didn’t contradict recent criticism that a new building would use up much more of the site’s greenspace than originally promised. At this point their argument for the new building is just to be annoyed at people who don’t agree with them.

Credit where it’s due: at least Sulton and Utz showed up. Board member James Herndon didn’t even show up. No explanation for his absence was given.

In my opinion, Decatur’s success as a city is downstream of our community’s dedication to its schools. Pursuing the ECLC plan as it is currently conceived weakens the city by eroding public confidence in our schools.

The board can fix it. First it has to pause the ECLC building project. Then it has to reopen public discussion about how best to expand our early childhood learning options. Third, the board needs to give fair consideration to all options. Fourth, no more graphic tees.

Decatur’s city commission is outraged. Mayor Tony Powers says the school board has destroyed public trust. Commissioner Mark Arnold says the school board is acting in gross violation of Decatur’s values, traditions, processes and is acting in “extraordinarily bad faith.”

Decatur’s state legislators are also worried. They are trying to force the school board to put the new building’s funding to a citywide referendum. They say the school board hasn’t been transparent about its choices, and hasn’t listened to community input.

On Friday the school board met to discuss a possible referendum. Board members Tracey Anderson and Lorraine Irier voted ‘yes’ on holding a referendum. Utz, who was quoted by WABE in January dismissing opponents of the current ECLC plan as a “loud, angry minority,” voted ‘no’ on holding a citywide referendum. Sulton and Herndon also voted ‘no’.

At the next community board meeting, I hope residents explain to Utz, Sulton and Herndon that if they believe that a happy majority of Decatur residents actually supports the construction of a new, $23 million school building they should have no problem putting the question to a citywide vote.

Unfortunately, even if we explain it to them, we can’t understand it for them.

2026-03-29
Open letter to City Schools of Decatur’s board and administrators

I support expanding early childhood education options for Decatur residents. I reject the insinuation (and flat-out accusation by at least one letter writer to Decaturish.com) that questioning the school board’s opaque, evasive process is an expression of hidden or hostile motives.

Yes, let’s do more and better early child care in Decatur.

Yes, tax me to pay for it because I actually love living in a community where my tax dollars pay for children to thrive.

Yes, let’s also openly discuss and debate the most durable, cost-effective solution to a real problem.

Yes, let’s also get community buy-in before forcing community pay-in.

My kids went to College Heights. If you interpret “let’s at least consider aloud making College Heights even nicer than it was when my kids happily went there” as some kind of sneaky, sinister opposition to accessible, affordable child care for all, that’s not a me problem. That’s 100% a you problem.

If you’re reading this, you can probably think of a lot of ways City Schools of Decatur can support equity in the district for kids ages zero to 18. I would like to make sure the city spends wisely so we can do as many of those things as possible.

A few days ago at a board meeting, a city resident asked the school board for data projecting how many no-tuition, partial tuition and full tuition students CSD expected would attend the school over several years. for enrollment projection data. The reply was ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. I’m paraphrasing.

The actual reply was that there would be, in the future, a presentation on enrollment projections. Call me old fashioned, but I’d like to know what we’re paying for and why we’re paying for it before we commit to paying for it.

Even more frustrating is the “We voted on this a long time ago,” position offered by some. Today’s school board is not sworn to agree with the votes of a previous board. That’s why there are elections. City residents, however, will be bound by the debt obligations of this board. That’s why deliberation, transparency and community buy-in are so important right now.

CSD’s administration and school board are squandering the community’s trust because they’re responding to public engagement and worry with contempt and petulance. Board members have hard jobs and I respect and appreciate anyone’s willingness to do the work, but if you perceive this many of your constituents as nuisances or obstacles, you should consider resigning. If I wanted to live in a community where reasonable questions about public spending are greeted with sneering contempt, I’d move back to D.C.

2026-03-13
Beer Hall Putsch

In 1923, Adolf Hitler attempted a coup at a beer hall in Munich. He got away with a slap on the wrist and held rallies at the beer hall celebrating the coup’s anniversary.

In 1939, Georg Elser tried and failed to kill Hitler at one of the rallies. Elser was caught and held at Dachau concentration camp, where he was eventually murdered.

The beer hall was demolished in 1979. The site is an arts center and hotel. The only remnant of the site’s infamy is a plaque in a public courtyard. It honors Elser.

German text: An dieser Stelle, im ehemaligen Bürgerbräukeller, versuchte der Schreiner Johann Georg Elser am 8. November 1939 ein Attentat auf Adolf Hitler. Er wollte damit dem Terror-Regime der Nationalsozialisten ein Ende setzen. Das Vorhaben scheiterte. Johann Georg Elser wurde nach 5 1/2 Jahren Haft am 9. April 1945 im Konzentrationslager Dachau ermordet.

English translation text: On this site, in the erstwhile Bürgerbräukeller, on November 8, 1939, the carpenter Johann Georg Elser made an attempt on the life of Adolf Hitler. He intended therewith to put an end to the terror regime of the National Socialists. The attempt failed. After 5 1/2 years of imprisonment, Johann Georg Elser was murdered on April 9, 1945, in the Dachau concentration camp.

Every year Munich’s city government awards the Georg Elser Prize to honor courageous acts in support of democracy.

2026-01-06
Kmart, saw and conquered

For the December 25, 2003 issue of Creative Loafing, I reviewed a Kmart. By the way, my dad really did buy me a vacuum that year.

As part of its effort to emerge from the K-Hole of bankruptcy, Kmart is testing out a nifty publicity scheme to get folks back into its stores called the Kstage. The Kstage is an actual stage in the back of the stores that hosts gurus who’ll help you improve your life — presumably via shopping at Kmart.

On Saturday, I visited the Kstage at the Mableton Kmart store. Instead of obvious gurus like Sri Lahiri Mayasaya or Sri Paramahansa Yagananda, the Kstage people went a little left field and brought in Robyn Freedman Spizman.

Spizman was on hand to discuss her book on gift-giving, The GIFTionary. The GIFTionary‘s premise is simple — give gifts based the recipients’ hobby interests or your feelings for the person, then mar the gift with a really bad pun in the note.

For example, give your friend a deck of cards with a note telling them that they’re the “real deal,” or your lover a pack of mints with a note saying “We’re mint to be.”

My dad just told me he’s getting me a vacuum cleaner this year. I hope he doesn’t include a note telling me that I suck.

2025-11-25
Decatur City Commission, District 2

Congratulations Cheryl Kortemeier, the new Decatur City Commissioner for District 2 (my district!). There are a handful of people who show up and work hard at every neighborhood or school event that needs volunteers. Cheryl is one of them. We’re lucky to have her as our rep.

Turnout for this election was enormous. In the last competitive election for this seat in 2019, 1,880 people voted. Cheryl and her opponent, Deanna Jue Sutandi, both received more than 2,000 votes. The population here didn’t double. Enthusiasm for voting did.

Voter enthusiasm in this election is primarily the result of our democracy-enjoying area being fired up about [waves hands in the direction autocrat], but credit to Cheryl and Deanna for being two great candidates who the neighborhood was excited to support.

Like Cheryl, Deanna is someone who volunteers her time and skill for all of us. When I was on PTA, she took the hardest volunteer job (the auction) and was great at it. When she asked me to put a sign in my yard, I was proud to. I hope she runs for something else.

2025-11-05