I support CSD’s commitment to providing quality early childhood education to everyone in Decatur, regardless of their family’s ability to pay preschool tuition. As Superintendent Whitaker noted at March 25’s school board community meeting in Oakhurst, the best way to close reading achievement gaps in adolescence is with early childhood education that prevents the gaps from developing.
Nevertheless, I do not believe a large capital investment in a new building would serve Decatur’s children better than other possible investments. I urge the board and CSD’s administration to utilize existing buildings instead to expand and enhance the city’s early childhood education options.
CSD’s administration and its board have not convinced me or many of my neighbors why a new $23 million building is the correct solution to meeting our shared goal of providing excellent early childhood care to Decatur’s kids.
Additionally, Decatur City Commissioner George Dusenbury presented compelling evidence at a recent public meeting that CSD’s existing ECLC plan is grossly overpriced.
Dusenbury said the contractor’s estimate for the new building is about $4 million too high. Even if one supports building a new ECLC facility, does anyone support paying $4 million too much for it? $4 million would pay for a lot of preschool tuition for a lot of kids.
The board needs to stop. Stop the building. Also, stop being so petulant about the opposition to the building. It’s dividing the city.
At last week’s board community meeting, an audience member opposing the new building’s location said that LaGrange has done a better job of historical preservation than Decatur. Utz replied sarcastically, asking if the speaker was recommending Decatur build its new preschool in LaGrange? The audience jeered him.
Perhaps mistaking the jeers for cheers, three days later Utz attended Talley Elementary School’s fundraiser wearing a shirt that reads “I can explain it to you, but I can’t understand it for you.”
Anyone who knows me knows I am a connoisseur of ridiculous t-shirts, but I’ve never seen that one before. Then again, I’ve never typed “What would Melania wear to an elementary school carnival men’s fitted medium” into Temu’s search bar.
Board chair and new building supporter Dr. Carmen Sulton took a different approach. She wasn’t sarcastic at last week’s community meeting. Instead she used her eyes to shoot ice lasers at the room when opponents of the new building were speaking. Watch a meeting video to see for yourself. You may want to grab a sweater first.
I attended the meeting expecting to hear Utz and Sulton try to persuade the audience that their preferred idea (a new building) is better than all the other possible solutions (renovating existing neighborhood school buildings). They’re proponents of the building, so surely, given an audience of taxpayers and a microphone, they’re going to press their case, right?
Wrong.
They didn’t bother talking up their preferred plan. They didn’t compare a new building’s cost or efficacy to renovation options. They didn’t contradict Commissioner Dusenbury’s evidence of $4 million in inflated cost projections. They didn’t contradict recent criticism that a new building would use up much more of the site’s greenspace than originally promised. At this point their argument for the new building is just to be annoyed at people who don’t agree with them.
Credit where it’s due: at least Sulton and Utz showed up. Board member James Herndon didn’t even show up. No explanation for his absence was given.
In my opinion, Decatur’s success as a city is downstream of our community’s dedication to its schools. Pursuing the ECLC plan as it is currently conceived weakens the city by eroding public confidence in our schools.
The board can fix it. First it has to pause the ECLC building project. Then it has to reopen public discussion about how best to expand our early childhood learning options. Third, the board needs to give fair consideration to all options. Fourth, no more graphic tees.
Decatur’s state legislators are also worried. They are trying to force the school board to put the new building’s funding to a citywide referendum. They say the school board hasn’t been transparent about its choices, and hasn’t listened to community input.
On Friday the school board met to discuss a possible referendum. Board members Tracey Anderson and Lorraine Irier voted ‘yes’ on holding a referendum. Utz, who was quoted by WABE in January dismissing opponents of the current ECLC plan as a “loud, angry minority,” voted ‘no’ on holding a citywide referendum. Sulton and Herndon also voted ‘no’.
At the next community board meeting, I hope residents explain to Utz, Sulton and Herndon that if they believe that a happy majority of Decatur residents actually supports the construction of a new, $23 million school building they should have no problem putting the question to a citywide vote.
Unfortunately, even if we explain it to them, we can’t understand it for them.
